September 3, 2015
| by
Johannes Schmidt
From left to right: Atlas
Network Sound Money Project Editor Johannes Schmidt, Dr. William Luther
of the Sound Money Project, U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chief
Economist and former Sound Money Project Fellow Dr. Thomas Hogan, Atlas
Network Senior Fellow and Sound Money Project Co-Director Dr. Judy
Shelton, Atlas Network President Alex Chafuen, and Atlas Network Sound
Money Project Manager Gonzalo Schwarz.
Money has become so far removed from public debate that everyday
citizens seem to have forgotten the importance that the Federal Reserve
plays in their lives and in their futures. That’s why, this past weekend
down the road from where the Kansas City Fed held its yearly Economic
Policy Symposium, Atlas Network partner the
American Principles Project (APP) hosted the first
Jackson Hole Summit.
There, economists, policy makers and sound money advocates gathered to
“challenge the policies of the Federal Reserve System and to hold the
Federal Reserve accountable for the impact of today’s monetary policy on
the nation’s economy,” as Steve Lonegan, director of monetary policy at
APP and summit organizer, stated in his welcome address.
The organizations represented at the summit included the Heritage
Foundation, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Cato Institute, the
British Parliament, the U.S. Congress, and Atlas Network’s
Sound Money Project.
As the first of its kind, this conference was by all measures a
success. Not only did it sell out two weeks in advance and attract press
from across the country, but also brought together advocates of
monetary reform and challenged them to address monetary policy in a way
that could easily reach the general public.
The Jackson Hole Summit took an important first step in making
monetary policy, also known as the “currency debate,” a mainstream issue
once again. This is important because, for years now, politicians have
made monetary policy an issue that is incomprehensible for the majority
of Americans, although it affects their day-to-day lives, both in the
short and long terms. From buying bread at the grocery store to paying
off mortgages, the value of money plays a fundamental role in the lives
of hundreds of millions of Americans. Furthermore, discretionary
policies mean that Americans cannot effectively plan ahead, instead
wasting time and resources because the purchasing power of their money
is not stable.
Although money is largely absent from public consciousness today, it
should be noted that this was not always the case. Elections have been
won and lost over monetary issues, and monetary stability affects
everybody’s life. It is therefore “important to challenge the
privileges, prerogatives, and the power of central banks,” argued Dr.
Judy Shelton, co-director of Atlas Network’s Sound Money Project, in
an interview with the Wall Street Journal.
“I think that having a conference to bring up the possibility that
central banks are not the solution, but actually the problem in terms of
regaining real economic growth, is vitally important.”
Fortunately, throughout the course of the summit, the speakers did
just that. The first lecture, “Government & Money: A Historical
Perspective,” was given by Dr. Lawrence White of George Mason
University. There, Dr. White explored the history of money in the United
States and set the tone for the conference by suggesting that inflation
rates under gold had remained relatively stable, and that “price level
uncertainty has been much higher under the Federal Reserve than during
the pre-Fed period.” Certainly, such conclusions were not likely be
reached by central bankers just down the road at the Fed’s symposium,
although some central bankers both
here and
abroad are beginning to question the effectiveness of central bank discretion.
In the first Sound Money Project lecture of the day, however, Dr.
Shelton did raise that necessary though still provocative question:
“What if Central Bankers Are Wrong?” Throughout her lecture, Dr. Shelton
noted that the world’s largest economies are currently operating under
different monetary regimes, manipulating their currencies and
undermining international monetary stability. Contrary to what some
central bankers might believe, that does not constitute competition, but
rather cheating. The world needs rules, but as Dr. Shelton noted in
a recent article published in The Hill,
“there’s only one problem with warning nations not to manipulate their
currencies and to play by the rules: There are no rules.” Because of
this, the world has not known a system where free trade was based on
genuine value since the collapse of Bretton Woods in 1971.
A later panel, titled “A National Monetary Commission to Chart the
Uncharted Monetary Territory,” discussed the plausibility of
reestablishing a national monetary commission where experts could
provide testimony on the Fed’s performance in terms of output, prices,
employment and overall financial stability. The participants, Dr.
William Luther of the Sound Money Project, U.S. Senate Banking Committee
Chief Economist and former Sound Money Project Fellow Dr. Thomas Hogan,
Ralph Benko of APP, and Dr. Norbert Michel of the Heritage Foundation
argued that a commission could garner public interest in the Federal
Reserve’s record and also put pressure on politicians to analyze the
Fed’s performance as a lender of last resort. As Dr. Luther sagely
noted, if we had had such a commission in 2008, “perhaps it would have
allowed us to avoid or at least mitigate some of the monetary missteps
that we experienced during that period.”
Later, in a panel titled “The Impact of Fed Policy on Millennials,” I
had the opportunity to join Jared Meyer of the Manhattan Institute,
Jiesi Zhao of the Young America’s Foundation, and well-known libertarian
blogger Julie Borowski in a discussion of how the Fed’s discretionary
monetary policies affect young people. Here, the panel concluded that
Fed discretion and economic activism disproportionately affects
millennials and makes it harder to reach traditional milestones such as
getting a first job, buying a house, or even getting married. As Jared
Meyer noted, “the Fed picks winners and losers through its policies and
the young are consistently the losers.”
The panel also offered me an opportunity to speak about the history
of the morality of money and to call on millennials to help reclaim
money’s moral high ground. As I stated in
a recent piece published in Townhall Finance,
“for those who are interested in living in a just and moral world, the
idea that money should not be debased or manipulated should come as
naturally as the idea that theft and plunder are wrong.”
The final Sound Money Project panel was moderated by Dr. Alejandro
Chafuen, co-director of the Sound Money Project and president of the
Atlas Network. There, Dr. Chafuen led British MP Kwasi Kwarteng, Dr.
Judy Shelton, and Mercatus Center Vice President for Outreach Maurice
McTigue in a discussion of “The International Monetary System and the
Frontiers of Reform.” This panel provided the audience with an
international perspective of the direction in which international
monetary policy should take.
One concept that was particularly well received was Dr. Shelton’s “gold-convertible” Treasury bonds. As
Breitbart explained,
“The bonds would be equivalent to regular 5-year Treasuries, but the
face value would be redeemable at the option of the bondholder into
dollars or a fixed amount of gold. Bondholders would gain protection
from losing purchasing power, and the government would be able to pay
much lower interest costs.”
Perhaps the best embodiment of the spirit of the conference were Dr.
Shelton’s concluding remarks, during which she questioned the Federal
Reserve system in a pointed and uncompromising manner, reprinted in
a New York Sun editorial:
We dare to talk about
the gold standard and its relative merits, knowing that the merest
whisper of a gold standard is enough to elicit the guffaws of the
central bankers down the road. Because they say “that’s just crazy.” And
I think, really? Crazier than negative interest rates? Crazier than
paying banks to keep loanable funds in sterile depository accounts at
the Fed? Crazier than having the Fed buy up trillions in government
debt, remit the interest payments back to treasury, and then count that
as revenue to the federal budget?
Is it crazier than
having hordes of financial market analysts parsing every word uttered by
a monetary official, obsessing over the minutes of the latest Fed
meeting trying to glean clues about what might happen next? It’s almost
as if we’ve forgotten how to engage in free enterprise, because we’re
waiting for marching orders from a central planning agency. I think
we’re the rational ones. They like to brand us as ideologues, but in
truth we’re the realists. And that sobering fact is becoming clearer
every day as reality continues to whipsaw global markets.
The success of the Jackson Hole Summit should allow proponents of
sound money to rest easy knowing that there are individuals ready once
again to bring the cause of money to the mainstream. The Sound Money
Project is committed to remaining on the forefront of that public policy
battle and, surrounded by such passionate allies, I am sure that we
will see success in a not-so-distant future. After attending the Jackson
Hole Summit, it is clear to me that the age of discipline and a
rule-based monetary system is once again on the horizon.